Actually it can get you plenty of places, for example the judgement 'avoid the guy with the free candy' when you're 5 will keep you alive or say 'heroin is a very bad thing to take' is also useful. I've noticed that the chronically naive and foolish often drone on about judgement or hate as though their inability to do those things somehow validates whatever demented idea they latch onto. I remember someone advocated pedophilia because the bible spoke of love-do you think I was right to judge him a scumbag?
Well the first one is pretty suss because on your fav page you've got semi-erotic work which casts doubts on 3 as well, I also see you missed my point as well. Tell me if I joined which did repulsive things and then defended that group-would it be unfair if I was judged as someone who supports this hypothetical group and defends it?
I wonder if you'll bitch out and block me as per usual on DA.
Correct from what I recall of playboy the images are of adult women who provided consent as opposed to child-like cartoon ponies. Plus I've yet to see playboy readers actually being a collective group in anyway.
That's a very weak defense for a number of reasons not in the least because the mlp fanbase is one of the (if not the) worst offenders for it. It also works on the assumption that two wrongs make a right. All you have is weak excuses.